Detroit Lions vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
The Detroit lions vs Baltimore ravens match player stats tell the story of an entertaining NFL showdown played on September 22, 2025, where the Detroit Lions defeated the Baltimore Ravens 38 to 30. While the final score shows an eight point margin, the game itself featured explosive offense, timely defensive plays, dominant rushing from Detroit, and an impressive passing performance from Baltimore quarterback Lamar Jackson. Fans searching for detailed statistics, player performances, and game analysis will find that this matchup offered nearly everything expected from two playoff caliber teams.
Detroit improved its record to 2 and 1, while Baltimore slipped to 1 and 2. The Lions controlled the game on the ground, recording 224 rushing yards and four rushing touchdowns, while the Ravens relied heavily on Lamar Jackson’s arm, producing three passing touchdowns and nearly 300 passing yards. Although Baltimore generated plenty of offensive highlights, Detroit’s ability to pressure the quarterback, force a critical turnover, and dominate the rushing attack ultimately decided the outcome.
This complete breakdown examines every important statistic, explains what the numbers actually mean, and highlights the players who made the biggest impact.
Match Overview
| Match Details | Information |
| Event | Detroit Lions vs Baltimore Ravens |
| League | NFL |
| Date | September 22, 2025 |
| Venue | NFL Regular Season |
| Final Score | Detroit Lions 38, Baltimore Ravens 30 |
| Winner | Detroit Lions |
| Detroit Record | 2 to 1 |
| Baltimore Record | 1 to 2 |
| Data Source | ESPN Box Score |
The contest featured momentum swings throughout the first three quarters before Detroit separated itself during the final period. Both offenses consistently moved the football, but the Lions produced longer drives through their powerful rushing attack, allowing them to control the clock and wear down Baltimore’s defensive front.
Detroit Lions vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
Anyone reviewing the detroit lions vs baltimore ravens match player stats will quickly notice two contrasting offensive philosophies.
Detroit focused on physical football by running the ball 38 times for 224 yards. Baltimore leaned on Lamar Jackson’s passing ability while mixing in Derrick Henry as its primary rusher.
Final Score by Quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Detroit Lions | 7 | 7 | 7 | 17 | 38 |
| Baltimore Ravens | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 30 |
For three quarters, neither team managed to create significant separation. Every quarter through the third ended evenly, showing how competitive the matchup remained.
The difference came during the fourth quarter.
Detroit exploded for 17 points, while Baltimore managed only 9, allowing the Lions to secure a convincing victory despite the Ravens’ productive passing game.
How the Game Unfolded
The opening quarter immediately established the tone. Both teams scored touchdowns, demonstrating balanced offenses capable of moving the ball efficiently.
During the second quarter, neither defense consistently stopped opposing drives. Jared Goff efficiently managed Detroit’s offense while Lamar Jackson answered with accurate throws that kept Baltimore within striking distance.
After halftime, both teams again traded touchdowns, making it clear that whichever defense created the first major mistake would likely determine the winner.
That turning point arrived late in the game.
Detroit’s defensive pressure became relentless. The Lions consistently collapsed the pocket, preventing Jackson from extending drives with his legs as effectively as usual. Meanwhile, Detroit’s offensive line continued opening running lanes for David Montgomery and Jahmyr Gibbs.
The Lions eventually pulled away with multiple scoring drives in the fourth quarter while forcing Baltimore into increasingly difficult passing situations.
Team Statistics Comparison
| Category | Detroit Lions | Baltimore Ravens |
| Final Score | 38 | 30 |
| Passing Yards | 202 | 288 |
| Passing TD | 1 | 3 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Rushing Attempts | 38 | 19 |
| Rushing Yards | 224 | 85 |
| Rushing TD | 4 | 1 |
| Total Offensive Balance | Excellent | Pass Heavy |
| Sacks | 7 | 0 |
| Tackles | 55 | 77 |
| Fumbles | 1 | 2 |
| Lost Fumbles | 0 | 1 |
Several numbers immediately stand out.
Baltimore threw for more yards.
Detroit completely dominated on the ground.
Detroit produced seven sacks.
Baltimore failed to register a single sack.
Those four statistical categories explain much of the final result.
Why Detroit Won Despite Fewer Passing Yards
Many fans naturally focus on passing statistics when evaluating quarterback play. However, football games are rarely decided by passing yards alone.
From watching games with similar statistical profiles over the years, one lesson consistently stands out. Teams that control the running game usually control the tempo, possession time, and physical intensity.
Detroit demonstrated exactly that.
Instead of forcing Jared Goff into high-risk situations, offensive coordinator play calling emphasized patience. The offensive line repeatedly created running lanes, allowing Montgomery and Gibbs to attack Baltimore’s defense from different angles.
That balanced offense also made play action far more effective, giving Goff cleaner throwing windows.
Meanwhile, Baltimore became increasingly dependent on Jackson’s passing arm. Although he performed extremely well statistically, the lack of rushing support placed more pressure on every possession.
Offensive Efficiency Breakdown
Detroit’s offense showcased impressive efficiency throughout the afternoon.
Passing
Jared Goff completed:
- 20 completions
- 28 attempts
- 202 passing yards
- 1 touchdown
- 0 interceptions
Rather than chasing explosive downfield throws, Goff consistently took what Baltimore’s defense allowed. His decision making minimized mistakes and helped sustain long scoring drives.
Ball security proved especially valuable against an aggressive Ravens defense.
Rushing
Detroit’s rushing attack completely changed the game.
The Lions averaged 5.9 yards per carry, an outstanding figure against one of the league’s traditionally physical defensive units.
Repeated successful rushing attempts shortened third downs, extended drives, and kept Baltimore’s offense waiting on the sideline.
By the fourth quarter, those sustained drives clearly affected Baltimore’s defensive stamina, allowing Detroit to finish the game strongly.
Baltimore’s Offensive Performance
Although Baltimore lost, its offense still deserves significant credit.
Lamar Jackson produced one of the better statistical passing performances of the week, throwing:
- 21 completions
- 27 attempts
- 288 passing yards
- 3 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
His accuracy remained exceptional throughout the contest.
Mark Andrews consistently found openings over the middle, while Rashod Bateman stretched Detroit’s secondary with timely receptions.
However, football requires offensive balance.
Detroit successfully limited Baltimore’s rushing attack to only 85 yards, forcing Jackson to carry much of the offensive workload himself.
When Detroit’s pass rush intensified during the fourth quarter, Baltimore struggled to sustain enough drives to complete its comeback.
The Importance of Fourth Quarter Execution
Championship level teams often distinguish themselves during the final fifteen minutes rather than the opening three quarters.
Detroit illustrated that principle perfectly.
Instead of becoming conservative, the Lions maintained offensive aggression while continuing to trust their running backs.
The offensive line remained dominant.
The defensive front increased pressure.
Special teams avoided costly mistakes.
All three phases contributed to Detroit’s decisive finish.
The statistical difference between the two teams during the fourth quarter reflects not just execution but overall conditioning, discipline, and coaching adjustments made after halftime.
Complete Offensive Player Statistics
A closer examination of the detroit lions vs baltimore ravens match player stats reveals that several individual performances shaped the outcome. Detroit relied on an elite rushing attack supported by efficient quarterback play, while Baltimore depended on Lamar Jackson’s passing and the reliable hands of Mark Andrews.
Although both offenses produced explosive moments, the Lions generated a better balance between passing and rushing, making them far more difficult to defend throughout four quarters.
Detroit Lions Offensive Player Stats
Jared Goff Controlled the Offense
Jared Goff delivered exactly the type of performance Detroit needed. Instead of forcing risky throws, he stayed composed in the pocket, distributed the football effectively, and avoided turnovers.
| Passing Stat | Jared Goff |
| Completions | 20 |
| Attempts | 28 |
| Completion Rate | 71.4% |
| Passing Yards | 202 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
A completion percentage above 70 percent is an excellent indicator of quarterback efficiency. Goff consistently made smart decisions, helping Detroit maintain possession and build long scoring drives.
Perhaps the most valuable aspect of his performance was protecting the football. Against a defense known for creating turnovers, finishing with zero interceptions proved extremely important.
David Montgomery Powered the Ground Game
David Montgomery delivered one of the most productive rushing performances of the game.
| Rushing Stat | David Montgomery |
| Carries | 12 |
| Rushing Yards | 151 |
| Average | 12.6 Yards per Carry |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
Montgomery’s numbers become even more impressive when considering his workload. Averaging over twelve yards per carry is remarkable in any NFL game.
His ability to break tackles and gain extra yardage repeatedly placed Detroit in favorable down-and-distance situations.
Several of his longest runs shifted momentum and energized the entire offense.
Jahmyr Gibbs Added Speed and Versatility
While Montgomery handled many of the explosive runs, Jahmyr Gibbs complemented him perfectly with consistency and quickness.
| Rushing Stat | Jahmyr Gibbs |
| Carries | 22 |
| Rushing Yards | 67 |
| Average | 3.0 Yards per Carry |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
Although his average per carry was lower than Montgomery’s, Gibbs played an equally important role.
His workload helped control possession, wear down Baltimore’s defensive front, and keep Detroit’s offense balanced.
Scoring twice further highlighted his value near the goal line.
Amon-Ra St. Brown Led All Detroit Receivers
When Detroit needed a dependable target through the air, Jared Goff frequently looked toward Amon-Ra St. Brown.
| Receiving Stat | Amon-Ra St. Brown |
| Receptions | 7 |
| Receiving Yards | 77 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
St. Brown consistently found soft spots in Baltimore’s coverage and converted important first downs.
Rather than chasing spectacular highlight catches, he focused on extending drives and maintaining offensive rhythm.
Those dependable receptions became especially valuable during scoring possessions.
Jameson Williams Delivered Big Plays
Jameson Williams caught only two passes, but each reception carried significant value.
| Receiving Stat | Jameson Williams |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving Yards | 43 |
His ability to stretch the defense prevented Baltimore from crowding the line of scrimmage.
Even with limited touches, his speed forced defenders to respect the deep passing game, indirectly creating additional running lanes for Montgomery and Gibbs.
Baltimore Ravens Offensive Player Stats
Despite the defeat, Baltimore produced several standout individual performances.
Their offensive success centered around Lamar Jackson’s passing ability and Mark Andrews’ dominance as a receiving threat.
Lamar Jackson Showed Elite Passing Accuracy
Lamar Jackson played exceptionally well despite the loss.
| Passing Stat | Lamar Jackson |
| Completions | 21 |
| Attempts | 27 |
| Completion Rate | 77.8% |
| Passing Yards | 288 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
Completing nearly 78 percent of his passes against Detroit’s defense demonstrates outstanding efficiency.
Jackson consistently delivered accurate throws under pressure and spread the football effectively among multiple receivers.
His three touchdown passes kept Baltimore competitive until late in the fourth quarter.
However, football remains the ultimate team sport. Even a nearly flawless passing performance cannot always overcome struggles in other phases of the game.
Derrick Henry Faced Constant Defensive Pressure
Detroit’s defensive line limited Derrick Henry far more effectively than many opponents have managed.
| Rushing Stat | Derrick Henry |
| Carries | 12 |
| Rushing Yards | 50 |
| Average | 4.2 Yards per Carry |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
While Henry still reached the end zone, Detroit prevented him from producing the explosive runs that often define his performances.
Limiting one of the league’s premier power backs to fifty rushing yards significantly altered Baltimore’s offensive balance.
Without a dominant rushing attack, the Ravens became increasingly dependent on Jackson’s passing.
Mark Andrews Dominated the Middle of the Field
Mark Andrews once again proved why he remains one of the NFL’s most dependable tight ends.
| Receiving Stat | Mark Andrews |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Receiving Yards | 91 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
His chemistry with Lamar Jackson was evident throughout the afternoon.
Whether facing zone or man coverage, Andrews consistently found open space and delivered crucial receptions.
Scoring twice demonstrated his effectiveness in the red zone, where his size and route running created matchup problems for Detroit’s defense.
Rashod Bateman Added Another Scoring Threat
Rashod Bateman complemented Andrews by stretching the field and creating explosive plays.
| Receiving Stat | Rashod Bateman |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving Yards | 63 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
His ability to gain separation forced Detroit’s secondary to defend the entire width and depth of the field.
Combined with Andrews’ production, Bateman ensured Baltimore remained dangerous throughout the game.
Offensive Team Comparison
| Category | Detroit Lions | Baltimore Ravens |
| Passing Yards | 202 | 288 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Completion Percentage | 71.4% | 77.8% |
| Rushing Yards | 224 | 85 |
| Rushing TDs | 4 | 1 |
| Total Offensive Style | Balanced | Pass Focused |
These statistics illustrate two very different offensive approaches.
Baltimore generated more production through the air, while Detroit dominated on the ground.
In many NFL games, balanced offenses tend to perform better in close contests because they can adapt to changing situations. Detroit demonstrated that flexibility throughout this matchup.
Which Offensive Players Had the Biggest Impact?
Several players delivered memorable performances, but a few stood above the rest.
Detroit Lions
- David Montgomery dominated with 151 rushing yards and two touchdowns.
- Jahmyr Gibbs added two rushing touchdowns while helping control the clock.
- Jared Goff efficiently managed the offense without committing turnovers.
- Amon-Ra St. Brown remained the team’s most reliable receiving target.
Baltimore Ravens
- Lamar Jackson threw for 288 yards and three touchdowns.
- Mark Andrews recorded 91 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
- Rashod Bateman added another touchdown reception.
- Derrick Henry contributed Baltimore’s lone rushing touchdown despite facing constant defensive pressure.
One interesting takeaway from the offensive numbers is that Baltimore had the more productive passing attack, yet Detroit’s ability to dominate the line of scrimmage through its rushing game ultimately proved far more valuable over four quarters.
The contrast between these offensive philosophies is one of the defining themes of the detroit lions vs baltimore ravens match player stats, showing that efficiency, balance, and clock control can outweigh superior passing production.
Defensive Player Statistics
While the offensive performances attracted most of the attention, the defensive side of the ball played an equally important role in determining the outcome. A review of the detroit lions vs baltimore ravens match player stats shows that Detroit’s defense consistently created pressure, limited Baltimore’s running game, and made crucial plays when the game entered its final stages.
Baltimore’s defense worked hard throughout the afternoon, recording a high tackle count, but it struggled to slow Detroit’s rushing attack or pressure Jared Goff. That difference became one of the biggest reasons the Lions walked away with a victory.
Detroit Lions Defensive Stats
Detroit’s defense combined disciplined tackling with an aggressive pass rush.
| Category | Detroit Lions |
| Total Tackles | 55 |
| Sacks | 7 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Fumbles Forced | 1 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 1 |
Seven sacks in a single NFL game is an outstanding achievement. Consistent pressure disrupted Baltimore’s offensive rhythm, forcing quicker decisions and making it difficult to establish a balanced attack.
Even though Lamar Jackson finished with impressive passing numbers, he rarely had the comfort of operating from a clean pocket throughout the contest.
Jack Campbell Led the Defense
Jack Campbell once again demonstrated why he is becoming one of Detroit’s most dependable defensive leaders.
| Defensive Stat | Jack Campbell |
| Total Tackles | 8 |
| Sacks | 1 |
Campbell consistently diagnosed running plays, filled gaps effectively, and contributed to Detroit’s pass rush.
His ability to impact both the running and passing game highlighted his versatility as a linebacker.
Al-Quadin Muhammad Changed the Game
The most disruptive defender for Detroit was Al-Quadin Muhammad.
| Defensive Stat | Al-Quadin Muhammad |
| Sacks | 2.5 |
Recording two and a half sacks against an offense led by Lamar Jackson is an impressive accomplishment.
Muhammad repeatedly collapsed the pocket, forcing hurried throws and preventing Jackson from comfortably extending plays outside the pocket.
Those pressures became especially important during the fourth quarter, when Baltimore attempted to mount a comeback.
Baltimore Ravens Defensive Stats
Baltimore’s defense showed determination but struggled against Detroit’s physical offensive line.
| Category | Baltimore Ravens |
| Total Tackles | 77 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
The Ravens finished with more tackles than Detroit because the Lions sustained long offensive drives and accumulated more rushing attempts.
However, the absence of a single sack proved costly.
Without consistent pressure on Jared Goff, Detroit’s offense maintained its rhythm throughout the game.
Kyle Hamilton Led Baltimore’s Defense
Kyle Hamilton delivered another dependable performance.
| Defensive Stat | Kyle Hamilton |
| Total Tackles | 9 |
Hamilton frequently stopped plays after short gains and remained active throughout all four quarters.
Despite his individual effort, Baltimore’s defense struggled collectively to slow Detroit’s rushing attack.
Defensive Comparison
| Defensive Category | Detroit Lions | Baltimore Ravens |
| Tackles | 55 | 77 |
| Sacks | 7 | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 1 | 0 |
This comparison highlights one of the clearest differences in the game.
Detroit generated constant quarterback pressure.
Baltimore did not.
In today’s NFL, creating pressure without relying solely on blitzes often determines close games. Detroit’s defensive front accomplished exactly that.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers frequently decide closely contested football games.
In this matchup, both quarterbacks protected the football exceptionally well.
Detroit
- 1 fumble
- 0 fumbles lost
- 0 interceptions thrown
Baltimore
- 2 fumbles
- 1 fumble lost
- 0 interceptions thrown
Although the turnover margin was small, Baltimore’s lost fumble gave Detroit an important extra possession.
Protecting the football while capitalizing on an opponent’s mistake remains one of the most reliable formulas for winning in the NFL.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams are sometimes overlooked, but they often influence field position and momentum.
Detroit enjoyed a slight advantage in this area as well.
Detroit Lions Special Teams
| Category | Performance |
| Kick Returns | 4 Returns, 110 Yards |
| Average Return | 27.5 Yards |
| Return Leader | Jacob Saylors, 80 Yards on 3 Returns |
| Field Goals | Jake Bates, 1 of 2 |
| Extra Points | 5 of 5 |
| Points Scored | 8 |
| Punting | Jack Fox, 48.7 Yard Average |
Jacob Saylors consistently gave Detroit favorable starting field position, allowing the offense to begin several drives with confidence.
Jake Bates also converted every extra-point attempt, ensuring Detroit maximized each touchdown.
Jack Fox maintained excellent field position through accurate and powerful punts.
Baltimore Ravens Special Teams
| Category | Performance |
| Kick Returns | 4 Returns, 105 Yards |
| Average Return | 26.3 Yards |
| Return Leader | Rasheen Ali, 105 Yards |
| Punt Returns | 3 Returns, 31 Yards |
| Punt Return Leader | LaJohntay Wester |
| Field Goals | Tyler Loop, 1 of 1 |
| Extra Points | 3 of 3 |
| Punting | Jordan Stout, 52.3 Yard Average |
Jordan Stout’s punting average was excellent, consistently flipping field position.
However, Baltimore’s special teams could not create the explosive momentum-changing play that might have shifted the game’s outcome.
Statistical Leaders
Passing Leader
| Player | Team | Yards | TD |
| Lamar Jackson | Baltimore | 288 | 3 |
Rushing Leader
| Player | Team | Yards | TD |
| David Montgomery | Detroit | 151 | 2 |
Receiving Leader
| Player | Team | Yards | TD |
| Mark Andrews | Baltimore | 91 | 2 |
Sack Leader
| Player | Team | Sacks |
| Al-Quadin Muhammad | Detroit | 2.5 |
Biggest Reasons Detroit Won
Looking beyond the box score, several factors explain why Detroit earned the victory.
1. Dominant Rushing Attack
Running for 224 yards allowed Detroit to dictate the pace of the game.
2. Elite Pass Rush
Seven sacks consistently disrupted Baltimore’s offensive rhythm.
3. Better Offensive Balance
Detroit successfully mixed rushing and passing plays, making its offense less predictable.
4. Winning the Fourth Quarter
Scoring 17 points in the final quarter demonstrated outstanding execution under pressure.
5. Ball Security
Detroit protected possession while taking advantage of Baltimore’s lone lost fumble.
What These Statistics Mean Going Forward
The numbers from this game reveal strengths and weaknesses for both teams.
For Detroit, the performance reinforced that a balanced offense paired with an aggressive defensive front can compete against elite opponents. Winning despite being outgained through the air shows that efficiency and physical football remain valuable in today’s NFL.
For Baltimore, Lamar Jackson’s passing performance was encouraging, and the connection with Mark Andrews remained a major offensive weapon. However, the team will likely look to improve its rushing consistency and pass protection in future games.
One lesson stands out after studying the detroit lions vs baltimore ravens match player stats in detail: football games are rarely decided by one spectacular statistic. Instead, victories usually come from excelling in multiple areas, including rushing efficiency, defensive pressure, turnover management, and fourth-quarter execution.
For readers interested in official NFL statistics and game rules, the NFL’s official Game Statistics and Information System provides authoritative resources and historical data: https://www.nfl.com/stats
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Detroit Lions and Baltimore Ravens?
The Detroit Lions defeated the Baltimore Ravens 38 to 30 on September 22, 2025. Detroit scored 17 points in the fourth quarter to secure the victory after a closely contested first three quarters.
Who had the best rushing performance in the game?
David Montgomery was the leading rusher, finishing with 151 rushing yards on 12 carries and 2 touchdowns. His explosive runs helped Detroit control possession and establish offensive momentum throughout the game.
How did Lamar Jackson perform?
Lamar Jackson completed 21 of 27 passes for 288 yards, threw 3 touchdown passes, and finished without an interception. Despite his outstanding passing performance, Baltimore could not overcome Detroit’s dominant rushing attack and defensive pressure.
Which receiver had the most receiving yards?
Mark Andrews led all receivers with 6 receptions for 91 yards and 2 touchdowns. For Detroit, Amon-Ra St. Brown was the top receiver with 7 catches for 77 yards and one touchdown.
Which team had the stronger defense?
Detroit’s defense made the bigger impact by recording 7 sacks, 6 tackles for loss, and recovering Baltimore’s only lost fumble. Those defensive plays proved decisive, especially during the fourth quarter.
What was the biggest difference in the game?
The largest difference was Detroit’s rushing attack. The Lions rushed for 224 yards and four touchdowns, while Baltimore managed only 85 rushing yards and one rushing touchdown. That advantage allowed Detroit to control the clock and finish the game strongly.
Conclusion
The detroit lions vs baltimore ravens match player stats illustrate why this matchup was one of the more entertaining contests of the 2025 NFL season. Both teams showcased high-level talent, with Lamar Jackson delivering an outstanding passing performance and Mark Andrews emerging as Baltimore’s primary receiving threat. On the other side, Jared Goff managed the offense efficiently, while David Montgomery and Jahmyr Gibbs powered one of Detroit’s most productive rushing performances of the season.
Although Baltimore generated more passing production, Detroit excelled in the areas that often determine close football games. The Lions dominated the ground game, protected the football, created relentless pressure with seven sacks, and outperformed the Ravens in the decisive fourth quarter. Those factors ultimately led to a well-earned 38 to 30 victory.
For fans, analysts, and fantasy football players, this game serves as an excellent example of how balanced offensive play and disruptive defense can outweigh even exceptional quarterback statistics. Looking beyond the final score, the individual and team performances provide valuable insight into each team’s strengths and the adjustments they may focus on as the season progresses.
